寻找文化身份与“当代中国哲学”(4)
作者：佚名； 更新时间：2014-12-05
冯 契：《中国近代哲学的革命进程》，上海人民出版社1989年版。
4．陈少明：《中国哲学史研究与中国哲学创作》《学术月刊》2004年第3期。
5．梁启超：《中国近三百年学术史》北京市中国书店1985年版。
6．《吉林大学社会科学学报》2004年第2期。
7．《中国社会科学》2004年第1期。
8．贺来：《“在批判旧世界观中发现新世界”与哲学的当代合法性》吉林大学社会科学学报，2002年第6期。
9．贝斯特，科尔纳：《后现代转向》南京大学出版社2002年版。
10．周予同：《中国经学史讲义》上海文艺出版社1999年版。
Seeking the Cultural Identity and “the Contemporary Chinese Philosophy”
Abstract:I think, as a meaningful subject, “the Contemporary Chinese Philosophy” is not a pure academic creation but an issue threshold that should determine its philosophical narration in the historical narration. As for “the Chinese philosophy”, on the one hand it can’t part from the historical destiny of Chinese’s seeking the cultural identity since the mordern times, on the other hand it has to find its narrative ways and philosophical languages in the evolutional logic, which is different from the Chinese and Western philosophy. It is in the history that “the contemporary philosophy” determines its narrative beginning and visual threshold. It is in the historical reception that “the contemporary philosophy” seeks the grounds for its survival significance. The philosophical form is needed in China in the contemporary times, which belongs to itself and suits its cultural identity. What is more, the philosophers are needed, who belongs to China itself.
Key words: the cultural identity; the contemporary Chinese philosophy;
the beginning and visual threshold of philosophy; philosophical evolutional logic
4．陈少明：《中国哲学史研究与中国哲学创作》《学术月刊》2004年第3期。
5．梁启超：《中国近三百年学术史》北京市中国书店1985年版。
6．《吉林大学社会科学学报》2004年第2期。
7．《中国社会科学》2004年第1期。
8．贺来：《“在批判旧世界观中发现新世界”与哲学的当代合法性》吉林大学社会科学学报，2002年第6期。
9．贝斯特，科尔纳：《后现代转向》南京大学出版社2002年版。
10．周予同：《中国经学史讲义》上海文艺出版社1999年版。
Seeking the Cultural Identity and “the Contemporary Chinese Philosophy”
Abstract:I think, as a meaningful subject, “the Contemporary Chinese Philosophy” is not a pure academic creation but an issue threshold that should determine its philosophical narration in the historical narration. As for “the Chinese philosophy”, on the one hand it can’t part from the historical destiny of Chinese’s seeking the cultural identity since the mordern times, on the other hand it has to find its narrative ways and philosophical languages in the evolutional logic, which is different from the Chinese and Western philosophy. It is in the history that “the contemporary philosophy” determines its narrative beginning and visual threshold. It is in the historical reception that “the contemporary philosophy” seeks the grounds for its survival significance. The philosophical form is needed in China in the contemporary times, which belongs to itself and suits its cultural identity. What is more, the philosophers are needed, who belongs to China itself.
Key words: the cultural identity; the contemporary Chinese philosophy;
the beginning and visual threshold of philosophy; philosophical evolutional logic
